Skip Navigation
Article

Key 2022 Health Trends – and what these mean for Employers

Healthcare is a top area of organizational spend.

What are some key trends in healthcare in 2022 and what can this mean for you, as a self-funded plan sponsor?

If you want to skip to the punchline –

  • costs are rising
  • the health system itself is evolving
  • DEI, SDoH, price transparency, and artificial intelligence invite new opportunities

In two words – EXPENSIVE CHANGE.

The big takeaway?  Take control and use the massive amounts of data available.  Health analytics will help you strategically navigate market transformation, minimize excess costs, and gain first-mover advantage to secure cost avoidance.

1. Healthcare costs are rising, and this will continue.

CMS.gov shared that U.S. health care spending increased 9.7 percent and reached $4.1 trillion in 2020.  The health “share” of our economy is projected to rise from 17.7 percent in 2018 to 19.7 percent in 2028. The most significant driver behind this is primarily driven by increases in health sector wages.

What this means for employers as plan sponsors:

As a payor, you’ll want to have the right tools and/or partnerships in place to be able to accurately anticipate and confidently strategize regarding your portion of costs.

What to do:

Offset increases in costs by optimizing plan performance.  Use analytics to surface savings opportunities.  The Great Resignation and turnover may have changed your employee base signficantly, and needs themselves are evolving.  You’ll need a refreshed and keen understanding of the workforce’s needs, utilization patterns, and engagement preferences.

Let’s assume you made solid decisions around health plans, plan administration, programs and policies.  Now, get the most out of these choices and proactively drive to the highest level of value possible.

Key TIP: Offset increases in costs by optimizing plan performance.

 

Eliminate guesswork.  Use health data to get the most out of partners and programs.

2. Market and industry disruption continues.

We’re watching the pandemic accelerate the adoption of virtual care and at-home care. We see business investment and digital innovation compliment longstanding desires for an increasingly streamlined, affordable system with improved care access and health equity.

Providers and carriers continue to explore and innovate business models. Value-based care options and accountable care organizations are growing.  There are countless new market entrants in the wellness and point solution space.

What this means for employers as plan sponsors:

New health programs and options may offer interesting visions, yet leave employers with many unknowns.

What to do:

Build a repeatable model that lets you easily pilot new approaches and comparably measure results. Find a partner to do the heavy lifting around data sourcing and management.  Focus your precious internal resource time on using insights with leadership and making strategic decisions.  Choose business partners with seasoned consultative and analytic specialists to track and compare cohorts.  Create holistic views that show associated impacts and connected costs.  Lean on your partner’s expertise to define metrics and analytic views in ways that support decisions around program expansion, change, or termination.

Key TIP: Create a data-driven program and repeatable model that lets you pilot new strategies or programs and compare measured results.

 

For instance:

Which joint replacement care approaches have the shortest associated disability duration, fewest average physical therapy visits, and lowest prescription costs?

Choose a flexible analytics technology that will let you analyze results across different plans, evolve over time, and bring in point solution data.

Work with an established vendor whose core vision is in line with providing health analytics to employers, like yourself.

Health Big Data is complex.  It requires highly specialized skill sets and domain expertise.

3. DEI and SDoH command the spotlight.

Survey results that report statistics like 83% of U.S. organizations reported implementing diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in 2021  and political activity like The Improving Social Determinants of Health Act of 2021 (S. 104/H.R. 379), illustrate the magnitude of momentum.

What this means for employers as plan sponsors:

2022 invites enormous opportunity to drive change by partnering with emerging DEI leaders who bring passion and creativity to evolving program design in ways that accommodate a broader set of needs.  The very qualities that make us unique and special and our social environments (both home and at work) influence what works well for each of us when it relates to health.  Employers that can measure what’s working for whom are set up to make smart and responsible benefits design decisions tailored for their population.

 

What to do:

Create a data-driven, measurable DEI and SDoH framework around your benefit offerings.  This could be looking at traditional metrics by salary range or race, incorporating third-party regional SDoH data, or even looking at variances in condition prevalence based on job types. Look at a minimum of 2 years of baseline data and prioritize equity gaps and key drivers.  Host small group lunches to ask employees for context around what you see in the numbers.  Engage with health plan- and community-based resources alternatives.  With analytic rigor surrounding your efforts, and a multi-disciplinary approach, you’ll see an impressive impact.

4. Health is more top of mind for more individuals.

Literally.  The need for mental health services is increased, and mental health has a known influence on physical health and overall health costs.  A Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) study found that during the pandemic, about 4 in 10 adults in the U.S. have reported symptoms of anxiety or depressive disorder, up from one in ten adults who reported these symptoms from January to June 2019.  One insurance company published mental health claims increased by 25% in 2020.

What this means for employers as plan sponsors:

Recognize your ability to support the whole person through benefits design.  Hit the streets and ask your employees what’s important and what is needed.

Total wellbeing?

You need connected data.

What to do:

It’s a great time to listen to what people say, and measure what they do.  In addition to adding mental health benefits, pilot environmental changes.  How do a blend of policy updates (e.g. mandatory meeting-free lunch-and-wellness hour?) and benefits expansion (coupled with a wellness program with fitness incentives) associate to employee satisfaction survey data and business goal measurement?  The data exists.  It’s just a matter of analyzing it.

 

5. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and predictive analytics foundations bloom.

AI and ML are being applied for clinical innovation in areas like medical imaging, drug discovery, and to predict disease early.  These are areas beyond an Employer’s realm.  But these same technical innovations are useful in population health management – for planning, resource management, and targeted communications.

 

What this means for employers as plan sponsors:

You’ll see more and more talk about health Big Data being used to define health experiences that personalize care, address diverse needs and preferences, and icrease engagement.

As an Employer, you are set to take a leading role in putting health data to work using AI, ML, and predictive analytics.  You have access to significant data, control of working conditions and environment, and a trusted relationship with individuals.

Creating a culture that grooms healthier people, invites short-term and long-term advantages:

  • increase health
  • lower health costs
  • improve employee retention
  • increase productivity
What to do:

Right now – use AI, ML, and predictive analytics to plan resources, build business continuity and forecast costs more accurately.  Next, dig into rising risk groups. Identify actions that influence a more positive outcome.  Work with vendors that embrace these technological opportunities – and ask them to articulate how their strategies drive savings for you, as a payor.

Health data is special

You want to analyze Low Value Care or isolate non-emergent ER visits?

Is the data a click away OR a data-engineering-month away?

 

Processing claims data for analytics means completely restructuring data so that it is useful.  It’s not just a final, adjudicated view of each claim. Claims data is translated into a mini-health biography for a set of care services tied to a specific member across a moment.

 

SIMPLE: How many patients in Hospital A were diagnosed with COVID?

 

COMPLEX: How many employees had COVID inpatient visits? What other conditions do they have? What is the range and value of related services during stays and recovery?  How many days of missed work?

 

 

Act, take control.

The costs are high, change is certain, and you have a host of strategic decisions you’ll be making.  Everything will be easier if you have answers at your fingertips for data-driven decisions, and a trusted team that can take care of managing data for you. Getting by with the same reports you used last year is no longer enough.

Three tips to consider:

  1. Resist expanding a BI solution: The allure to apply a corporate business intelligence solution to a new domain (health data) is strong. But consider the data.  You’ll need clinical expertise, claims processing logic, coding, classification, and enrichment to create dimensionality to ask specific questions.  There’s a reason there is an entire industry around processing health Big Data.    A specialized solution will bring sophisticated health data management that does this.  A corporate BI tool will not.

 

  1. Partner with experts: Work with a trusted advisor with a strong health analytics practice that can provide you with data-driven answers. Consider a partner who will open dashboards in meetings and navigate through data in response to your ‘next questions’ as you work through a topic.  Look for firms that can translate what they see in the numbers – clinical expertise coupled with health system expertise.  What are viable alternatives for certain types of care visits?  What are special considerations for individuals with particular conditions?

 

  1. Focus on the fun part: Build data-driven expertise within your team and leave the detailed data work to a specialty partner. The highest value (and most interesting work!) comes from using the data, so spend your time on that.  Organize so the work of sourcing, integrating, and enriching data is just done for you.  Vendors like HDMS build efficiencies by performing and optimizing back-end work across many clients.  Expect trusted, reliable data without the headaches.  If needed, augment in-house expertise using Analytics Practice services, but keep at least one resource close to the work.

 

It doesn’t have to be hard.  HDMS works with many large employers that ask one or two internal resources to drive a strategic program, sometimes among other responsibilities.  HDMS takes care of the rest. Start today to build a culture and strategic competence around data-driven decisions for a top-area of organizational spend.

Trending now

SDoH analytics – Insights we can trust.

Using SDoH insights means we understand and trust the data we use in our analyses.

How do we do that?

SDoH analytics requires a lot of data, and different types of data. Claims data tells us about health care visits. Digital device data tells us about daily health. And special data sets apply what we know in a way that delineates the social and environmental factors that could influence each member.

In SDoH analytics, we understand each person as an individual and in context, but look at a community as a whole in aggregate, to see what trends and patterns emerge.


Here are 5 important aspects to consider, and tips of what to look for, so you can trust the insights in your SDoH analytic endeavors.

  1. How is the data integrated?
  2. How specific and granular is the underlying data?
  3. What is the social determinant being analyzed?
  4. Can you clearly understand the definitions and data sources used for insights?
  5. How trusted is the health data itself?

Let’s dig into some more details on each.


#1 – The data model: How is the data organized and connected together?

  • Wellness means care and lifestyle choices. This data is scattered across many different places. Health analytics must integrate complex claims data structures and lifestyle data at an individual person level. SDoH analytics should also be connected at a person level. This way, the data is ready to serve all the analytic questions you may ask, without additional data preparation and delays.

#2 – Granularity: What level of detail characterizes the data sources used?

  • The more granular a data set is, and assuming it is associated at a member-specific level, the more trustworthy and usable your SDoH insights will be. Think about the variation of social and environmental factors you see across an entire zip code. Now think about the degree of variation you see within a neighborhood. A Census Block Group is akin to a neighborhood. This means if you have source data that has a Census Block Group level of granularity, you are seeing only the degree of variation across neighborhoods, not entire zip codes.

Here are two tips for building out a new solution:

  1. TIP: Find out the options you have around individual member address data. Ask questions about the quality and completeness of these fields. Ideally your solution will have the flexibility to use or assemble the most complete collection of member addresses possible.
  2. TIP: The best solutions offer a member-level integration to at least census block group level.  That associates people to the social and environmental factors known to a neighborhood level of insight.


#3 – Specificity: Which factor are you investigating?

  • Social and environmental factors cover a broad range of influences on health. Air quality or water quality? Economic hardship or transportation access? There is so much we can do if we have lots of different SDoH indices to choose from. For instance, one HDMS client is looing at the transporation index alongside the technology index to assess the potential usefulness and impact of a mobile unit verse a virtual solution for specific care services. Locations with low transporation AND low technology indices are prioritized for mobile services, while other locations are suitable for virtual care alternatives.

Here are two tips for building out a new solution:

  1. TIP: Make sure your solution offers data and SDoH indices that meet broad investigative needs.  Most organizations have many questions and require multiple SDoH indices. In a discovery phase – a few options let users understand opportunities to act impactfully based upon different criteria. 
  2. TIP: Consider ways to allow analytic journeys to mature. Composite indices can be great for initial analysis. As a team starts to work on designing for a barrier or opportunity, a more specific SDoH indice will reveal important nuances or details.




HDMS offers over 25 SDoH indices and dimensions.

Start with composite indices that allow you to look broadly across a number of factors at once.  Use focused indices to support very specific or nuanced investigations, like food access or social isolation.  They can also be used together – for instance the transportation index and the technology index example we shared above.

#4 – Transparency: What are the definitions behind the numbers?

  • Have a good understanding of which social or environmental factor you are investigating and where that index is sourced. There are a wide variety of options. Nothing will be perfect. Some indices are more complete, more granular, more recently or frequently updated, than others. As you interpret results, have transparency around the process leading to the metrics. This will help everyone interpret and apply insights better in the long run.

#5 – All the data: What’s the quality of your core health data sources?

  • As we think about integrating new data to investigate social determinants of health, we naturally focus on the new data – the addition. But we need to link that to core health data. Let’s not forget the quality and usability of those systems or sources. The data quality processes surrounding your traditional analytics are a critical part of trusted SDoH insights.

One last tip:

TIP: Enriching claim data delivers fast and intuitive investigations. This makes SDoH analytics easier too.

Enrichment can have many forms: classify claims by episode treatment groups (ETG), apply pharmaceutical classifications, and flag specialty druges. Enrichment processing also identifies gaps in care and low value care and makes it easy to surface these individual moments into analytics.

ER visits that have been classified using the NYU methodology allow you to quickly look at who visited the ER for non-emergent care, just by using a few filters.  Now think how powerful it is to further see these visits by income index.



Check out how easy it is to include Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) factors into an analysis.


Easy to use – more time for driving change.


HDMS Enlight offers the most comprehensive out of the box SDoH analytics on the market.

Read about Enlight and contact us with any questions.

Trending now

Best Practices to Measure Point Solution Value

Have answers regarding “Point Solution Value” that your boss will love.

Point solutions have been a great way to enhance benefits and provide care for a targeted need. 

Large employers and plan sponsors have on average 9+ point solutions as part of their health and wellness benefits.  But as point solution costs add up, the pressure increases to understand, and sometimes PROVE, the value. 

Most firms have programs that help workers identify health issues and manage chronic conditions (health risk assessments, biometric screenings, and health promotion programs). 

83% of large firms offer a program in at least one of these areas: smoking cessation, weight management, and behavioral or lifestyle coaching.

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation study

So, here are three best practices to consider, to deliver business decision-ready analytics, about the value of point solutions.


Best Practice #1: Use a cohort strategy to evaluate point solutions.

  • Cohort comparisons are the ultimate analytic strategy for proving value. Without a direct comparison within the same population, there are so many factors that introduce doubt on what the numbers truly capture. Alternatively, by looking at well defined and specifically differentiated groupings of people, we can directly compare performance take away concrete and specific learnings.

Here are two more pro tips:

  1. Look at related costs across your cohorts: Determine if there is value beyond just the immediate program financials. For instance, we have looked at disability claims, to measure the influence of a point solution program.
  2. Look at related health concerns: Investigate other aspects of wellbeing to see if there are notable halo effects.  For instance, we have investigated if there are mental health differences across maternity program types, short and longer term.

Here’s a good example from our client base: This national retailer wanted to measure the value of a Center of Excellence strategy for heart conditions.  The metric strategy compared a well-defined pair of cohorts that looked beyond traditional utilization and cost metrics.  We helped them also include mortality rates (COE – lower), returns to work (COE – faster), outcomes (COE – better), and company satisfaction (COE – higher).  Yes, that’s right – employees actually reported a higher employee satisfaction rate on the survey following a major episode of care.


Best Practice #2: Ask the right analytic questions.

  • Often “What’s the value?” is the wrong question. The correct question is “Who is this valuable for?” or “What’s the incremental value?”

There will always be a portion of a population that is engaged in their health and wellness. Your data can tell you who this population is, and provide insights that help you identify more people “like them” that you can target and pull along, therefore increasing program value. Also consider if the engaged audience would have been healthy or well without the special program, in some other way. Is it the program – or the people – that are providing the results you see?

Analyze for the big picture and long term.

Choice might be the right choice. The optimal strategy may not be selecting the best performing program in some cases. Use data to confirm if similar point solution programs are engaging the same or different audiences.

One self-funded employer had two somewhat similar wellness point solutions – Solution A emphasized “exercise and feel better.”  Solution B emphasized “Eat right and feel better.”  They both showed value – which one should they keep?  A deeper investigation of the data revealed that the solutions were in fact engaging somewhat different audiences.  The self-funded plan sponsor found they increased the value of BOTH point solutions by understanding the demographic nuances, and creating more targeted communications and incentives that used these insights.

Design Early Indicator metrics. Don’t wait for results (e.g., traditionally after year 3 of data is collected and analyzed).  Design metrics that act as leading indicators.  After year 1, plan to optimize and performance tune.  Move the conversation.  Avoid “Wow – it looks like our MSK program had trouble engaging our guys in the warehouses even after 3 years,… should we look into a different solution or approach?”  Prepare for, “Wow – it looks like our MSK program is having trouble engaging guys in the warehouses – what’s our plan to tackle this as we plan for year 2?”


Best Practice #3: Use ALL the data we have available in today’s analytic world.

  • Understand how social determinants of health influence engagement and utilization.  Then optimize the point solution to meet broader needs by removing barriers.  The data can show you where actions will be impactful.

Leverage solutions that package this data for you. Data that provides insights into social determinants of health can be time consuming to assemble into an analytic environment and then align to member health data. And yet it’s so powerful for insights. Your analysts time is better spent using this data as opposed to prepping it manually.

We evaluated medical and dental claims for diabetics after the introduction of a new Virtual PCP program.  The solution was selected after seeing a statistically significant difference in PCP utilization across various household income segments.  We created a specific scope around diabetics to study impacts on utilization, medication adherence, medical costs, and co-morbidities in mental health.  Not all investigation can rely solely on data.  The task force team worked with “Voice of the Member” groups, formed based on specific demographics. They focused on understanding context and color behind the numbers.  Transportation, time away from work, and caregiving themes arose in the care access category.  Other reasons were also presented, but offered less immediately actionable solutions.

With less time prepping data, the team had more time to dig deep, address quantified specific barriers, and is now measuring impact.



Check out how easy it is to include Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) factors into an analysis.


Easy to use – more time for driving change.


HDMS Enlight makes it easy to put these best practices to work.

Learn more and contact us with any questions.

Trending now

Prepare for your health analytics implementation before you buy a thing!

Avoid buyer’s remorse.

Did you ever have a home improvement project that finished late and cost more than you expected? How about a technology implementation that finished late and cost more?

You are more likely to be on-time and on-budget if your plan is thoughtful and reflects your reality. Don’t you want to have confidence knowing what you’re really getting into?

So, here are three tips to set you up for implementation success when it comes to health analytics:

  1. One-size does not fit all. It’s unlikely your implementation is the same as other organizations.  Why?  Because the culture of your organization is a huge factor.  Dig in.  What are the details behind YOUR implementation plan?

Tip!



Discuss what will be problematic or painful based on your experience and what you are moving away from. Are those complexities appropriately addressed, cared for, or resourced? Think about metric definitions and consensus, data quality, data reconciliation, matching and integration across sources, and slowly changing history.
  1. Identify what is- and is-not in your control. If something is beyond your direct control, is there a named resource and escalation path?  What risk does that pose to the project timeline based its nature.  For instance, your health analytics implementation is reliant on data from others.  How are your relationships and service level agreements with those partners and vendors?  How does that affect your plan and what’s the back-up plan?
Tip!

Before your implementation starts, refresh your knowledge of the day-to-day contacts, authorities, and any contractual SLA’s you have in place. If there will be costs associated with establishing new feeds or data interfaces, identify those early.
  1. Top down, bottom up, or an interesting mix? Think about the approach that will work better for your organization.  What process works for you – here’s my data – what can I do with it?  Or here are my objectives – what data do I need?  There are pros and cons to each but thinking about this as you prioritize is invaluable for setting internal expectations and getting the right resources lined up.
Tip!

Use phase 1 for quick wins. Standard sources generally seamlessly populate the most common views. Users feel like they get a lot out of the gate and that helps tremendously with adoption.

Remember, you’re better off with an implementation plan that’s realistic rather than one that sounds like a dream but doesn’t work well for you in the end.

Useful Documents

Enlight

Enlight is a flexible analytic platform that unlocks the power of data. It brings data to life and reveals
connections and insights so you can make being healthy more affordable, convenient, engaging, and equitable.

Read more.

Useful Documents

Read about what we do and who we serve.

Open me
Article

A data-driven approach to health care benefits that bridge equity gaps


There are tremendous point solution programs out there.

With so many diverse needs and suspected equity gaps, where should investments be made? How does one start to show evidence of the true value delivered?

Learn from HDMS clients finding answers. Read some keen insights shared by our client experience team leader, Jason Elliott, published in HR.com.


Or just read below – we’ve copied the article to this page.

Image from Shutterstock

Meaningful Health Benefits For All (HR.com)

A data-driven approach to health care benefits that bridge equity gaps

By Jason Elliott | September 9, 2022 Read time: 5 min

Any HR executive today will tell you how challenging the current environment is for attracting and retaining talent. According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were 11.2 million open job positions (vacancies) across the US at the end of Q2 2022. Hence, it stands to reason that organizations are rolling out the red carpet to try to appeal to job-seekers, offering sign-on bonuses as well as comprehensive health and financial benefits. Wellness rewards and a varied suite of ancillary health benefits have become the norm rather than the exception.   

While the impact of these comprehensive ancillary benefits can be significant, so can the cost—especially since inflation is at a 40-year high. Therefore, data analytics are more vital now than in the past for driving decisions around the offering, expanding, or discontinuing various programs. The rise in the availability of new data enables nuanced and sophisticated analyses to determine the value of “total rewards” packages.  

Analytics Evolution: Powerful Revelations from Digital Data Connections  

For years, the set of metrics used to measure the success of any health benefits program was limited to simple data elements available in standard claims. For example, the number of members who enrolled in a program, or the number of members who had one visit with a health care provider. Unfortunately, measurable health impacts usually do not occur immediately. Therefore, the success of a program cannot be determined immediately with any level of confidence.   

However, enrollment metrics are no longer the only available barometer for engagement. The aggregation of traditional claims with non-traditional digital data sets now allows us to connect dots that were previously either invisible or inaccessible, thus revealing new trends and powerful insights. 

The ability to identify how members engage with a certain program—and why—gives organizations the power to build programs around their employees’ real-life needs and make progress in delivering on the triple aim of reducing cost, improving health, and improving quality and experience. Questions commonly asked of our data analytics teams recently include:

  • How often are employees using our wellness or chronic condition management programs? 
  • Are engagement patterns different for different sub-populations?
  • Have those programs yielded positive health outcomes? 
  • Are there other health gaps that should be addressed instead? 

Engagement in a program has been redefined. For example, rather than tracking just a daily step count in a fitness program, granular metrics like the frequency and intensity of biking, running, weight training, or even dancing are used in tandem with medical and pharmacy claims to identify discernible, meaningful, and quantifiable value. 

Other examples of data types frequently leveraged from various solutions include biometrics (e.g., BMI, BP), lab tests (e.g., blood sugar, cholesterol, A1C, etc.), sleep patterns, meditation and mindfulness minutes, mood changes, dietary changes, etc. 

It is possible to then look holistically at a program’s impact on employees’ health, wellbeing, productivity, quality of life, retention, disability avoidance, and other indicators—driving more effective benefits decisions.

The concept of coordinated and continuous care is not new, but clinical and digital transformation across the industry is now bringing us closer to achieving it. Understanding an individual’s interactions with care when they are healthy and not just when they are ill drives policy changes to reduce the burden of illness. 

New Insights to Articulate Value

All programs offer something and will benefit some of the people in an organization. Often, the question is whether the magnitude of the benefit derived is enough to offset the cost of the program itself. This, in turn, drives decisions around expanding or discontinuing a solution. 

One large employer, for instance, offered two separate wellness programs that promoted a healthy lifestyle with diet and exercise goals. However, one focused more on the exercise component while the other concentrated on healthy and mindful eating. When the employer tried to assess the effectiveness of both programs to determine if one added more value than the other overall, the data showed a very interesting and unique pattern. It revealed that adoption and engagement in the two solutions differed along racial, ethnic, and income lines. Different populations engaged with these solutions at similar levels for reasons outside of health status. As a result, the company decided to retain both programs since they obviously were essential to varied groups. 

Likewise, mental well-being is now universally recognized as a critical part of overall health. Many organizations are compiling a profile of those who engage with their mental well-being solutions (e.g., EAP mental health programs) and evaluating their impact on employees’ medical comorbid conditions.

For one such organization, bringing together medical, pharmacy, and mental health EAP (digital) data brought to light an interesting link between anxiety and heart disease. Specifically, 30% of those with a new diagnosis of anxiety also had a new diagnosis of hypertension and/ or ischemic heart disease in the same year. They also sought care for other indicators of acute stress, such as flare-ups of autoimmune conditions. This insight helped the benefits team better align their concierge services to ensure a more holistic health model, where the mental, emotional, and physical health needs were addressed together.

Employers are also making major changes to benefit designs in a deliberate effort to remove barriers to care access, especially since the pandemic exposed the vulnerabilities of low-income and minority communities to weather major health storms. 

As an example, several organizations have removed waiting periods (typically 30-90 days) for new employees to become eligible for health and financial benefits. Others have expanded paid sick time benefits for all workers, including hourly employees for whom paid sick time used to be rare. Some organizations that offer wellness rewards and incentives have done away with mandatory activities with incremental payouts.

Value for All 

Across health care, clinical and digital transformations are making it easier to analyze how people interact with health benefits—both mental and physical health, when sick and when well. Consequently, data also makes it possible to evaluate how the advantages of various programs differ for different subpopulations. When benefits are designed for total well-being, their value cannot be measured in silos—hence data analysts have become the new superheroes.

Jason Elliott Vice President of Employer Customer Experiences
Health Data & Management Solutions (HDMS)

Jason Elliott is Vice President of Customer Experience for Employer clients at HDMS.  A true public health enthusiast with a Masters in Epidemiology, he spent over a decade delivering dedicated clinical analytics and leadership at BCBS.  Since then, Jason has managed the managed the Employer practice area.  He brings very structured thinking into the types of problems his clients are trying to solve, and what can be done with the insights discovered.

Article

Point Solutions - Let's talk outcomes


Employers investing in wellness programs and point solutions, but the cost of the collection of programs is exacerbating inflated health care costs.

As decision-makers think about what to keep and where to reduce costs, the increasing amount of data available for insights is proving very worthy.

Read how HDMS recommends employers approach this, published in Benefits Pro.
or just read below – we’ve copied the article to this page.

(Photo: Khakimullin Aleksandr/Shutterstock)

Cumulative sticker shock triggers meaningful health benefits analysis (Benefits Pro)

Data analytics prove to be vital now (more than in the past) in driving decisions around offering, expanding, or discontinuing various ancillary benefit programs.

By Rani Aravamudhan | July 28, 2022 at 10:15 AM

Inflation is accelerating — not just gas and food prices, but also health care costs, and at much faster rates than years past. At the same time, employers are working hard to attract, care for and retain employees with relevant and comprehensive benefits.

Healthcare point solutions (e.g., diabetes or blood pressure management solutions, fitness apps, etc.) have exploded in popularity as part of healthcare benefits, but they also cost a pretty penny.  Hence data analytics prove to be vital now (more than in the past) in driving decisions around offering, expanding, or discontinuing various ancillary benefit programs. The rise in the availability of new data types from these solutions enable nuanced and sophisticated analyses to determine the value of the whole benefits or “total rewards” packages as they are dubbed.

Analytics evolution: Powerful revelations from digital data connections

For years, the set of metrics used to measure the success of any program was limited to simple data elements available in standard claims – the number of members that enrolled in a program or the number of members that had one visit with a provider. Enrollment metrics are no longer the only available barometer for engagement.  For instance, the aggregation of traditional claims with non-traditional digital data sets allows for connection of dots that were previously invisible or had no access, thus revealing new trends and powerful insights.

Engagement In a program has thus been redefined. Rather than tracking how many people enroll in a certain wellness or fitness program, granular metrics like the frequency of use of apps or numbers of digital visits with clinicians  are used in tandem with medical and pharmacy claims to identify discernible, meaningful, and quantifiable value. Other examples of data types frequently leveraged from various solutions include biometrics (e.g., BMI, BP), lab tests (e.g., blood sugar, cholesterol, A1C, etc.), sleep patterns, meditation and mindfulness minutes, mood changes, dietary changes, etc. It is possible to then look holistically at a program’s impact on employees’ health, wellbeing, productivity, quality of life, and other indicators — driving more effective benefits decisions.

The concept of coordinated and continuous care is not new, but clinical and digital transformation across the industry is now bringing us closer to achieving it. Understanding an individual’s interactions with care when they are healthy and not just when they are ill drives policy changes to reduce the sick times.

The ability to identify who is, or is not, engaging with a certain program — and why — gives organizations the power to build programs around their employees’ real-life needs. Questions commonly asked of our data analytics teams include:

  • How often are employees using our wellness or chronic condition management programs?
  • Have those programs yielded positive health outcomes?
  • Are there other health gaps that we should be addressing instead?

Case studies: What employers are learning

A few case studies illustrate how data is impacting employer healthcare decision-making:

  1. In the first case study, an organization has a high prevalence of hypertension. It offers a diet and nutrition program with an app that allows for personalized nutritionist consults, meal plans and more. The organization then tracks the utilization of specific app features and sees strong adoption. Their pharmacy claims show a decline in the average number of hypertension medications prescribed to each member in the group with high adoption compared to non-engaged members with hypertension. This is tangible evidence that the diet and nutrition benefit is improving health outcomes for this group.
  2. All programs offer something and will benefit some people in an organization. The question is often whether the magnitude of the benefit derived is enough to offset the cost of the program itself. This in turn drives decisions around expanding or discontinuing a solution.

In the second case study, one large employer offered two separate wellness programs that promoted a healthy lifestyle with diet and exercise goals. However, one focused more on the exercise component while the other concentrated on healthy and mindful eating. When they tried to assess the effectiveness of both (to determine if one added more value than the other overall), the data showed a very interesting and unique pattern. Adoption and engagement in the two solutions differed along racial, ethnic and income lines. Different populations engaged with these solutions likely for reasons outside of health status. As a result, the company decided to retain both programs since they obviously were essential to varied groups.

  1. Mental wellbeing is now universally being recognized as a critical part of overall health. Organizations are evaluating impact of mental health solutions on their employees’ medical co-morbid conditions.

For one such organization, bringing together medical, pharmacy and mental health EAP (digital) data brought to light an interesting link between anxiety and heart disease. Specifically, 30% of those with a new diagnosis of anxiety also had a new diagnosis of hypertension and/ or ischemic heart disease in the same year. They also had sought care for other indicators for acute stress. This insight helped the benefits team better align their concierge services to ensure a more holistic health model, where the mental and physical health needs were addressed together.

How can data drive value for you?

Health benefits are far too expensive and important to select based on partial insights or guesswork. Thankfully, the days of using proxy indicators to measure success are over. The growing convergence of digital and traditional data allows organizations to evaluate programs in the context of real value to support their most valuable resource — their employees.

Rani Aravamudhan

Dr. Rani Aravamudhan leads HDMS Clinical Advisory services. She is a general medicine physician who cares for individuals yet connects experiences to population health perspectives using her deep data expertise. Rani is known for her work in data-driven transformation, workflow design and development, value-based care, risk management and clinical quality and performance reporting. Her work and team guides clients to understand what is possible with data, find answers and insights within projects and analyses, and gather context and scale across the HDMS client base.

Looking to measure Point Solutions? Quantify health outcomes?

Read some best practices from our Analytics Practice experts.

Article

How to measure your wellness program’s ROI

Published in BenefitsPro
Authored by Rani Aravamudhan, Senior Clinical Consultant, HDMS


While many employers are willing to invest in wellness programs, they aren’t always clear on the goals for these benefits.

Rather than jumping on the wellness bandwagon or adding a program just to expand the suite of benefits, employers would be better served to evaluate and make decisions based on data.

Read how HDMS recommends employers approach this, published in Benefits Pro.
or just read below – we’ve copied the article to this page.

Achieving maximum ROI from wellness programs comes from changing behaviors, especially of those who are most at risk for adverse health events and consequently would benefit the most from these initiatives. (Photo: Shutterstock)

Wellness Programs

Wellness programs have become a staple of employer benefits offerings. According to one KFF trends report, nearly 9 in 10 employers with a workforce of 200 or more offered some sort of workplace wellness initiative in 2019.

While many employers are willing to invest in wellness programs—which often are offered through third-party vendors—they aren’t always clear on the goals for these benefits. Multiple surveys and studies across the industry attest to this. No clear goals mean no systematic approach to defining and consequently measuring ROIs.

Most employers rely on wellness vendors’ claims about the potential to improve health outcomes and reduce health care costs. They do not necessarily have the means and/ or expertise to independently verify the proposed advantages either prior to or after implementing them.

Metrics used by vendors to illustrate their successes are not always applicable to all populations or groups. For instance, let’s say a vendor’s “expected outcomes” include a 20% increase in smoking cessation rates. Is that 20% over three months or over three years since the last smoking incident? Or, is it based on a one-time pledge by the participant? What was the size of the overall smoker population in their sample data? Then there is always the question, “Is that the right metric for your population?”

Data analytics can provide objective insights to evaluate such partnerships before beginning, renewing or expanding a wellness program.

Prepare for the evaluation

Like any strategic endeavor, effective ROI measurement requires diligent groundwork before actual data analysis can begin. It is essential to ensure that the right metrics are chosen for measurement of “before” and “after” states.

Concrete objectives will vary by employer as well as by program—but beware of setting goals focused solely on short-term “dollars-in” vs. “dollars-out.” An effective wellness program aimed at promoting better rates of preventive care with active engagement may actually increase expenses in the immediate and short term. In such cases, the true long-term objective should be to shift health care services from unpredictable, high-cost settings like the emergency department (ED) to more predictable, lower-cost settings like primary care physicians’ offices.

Today’s wellness programs tend to be more holistic in their approach to employee health than the offerings of just a few years ago. Many employers are looking for more than isolated reductions in smoking rates or ED visits. They are starting to understand the overall health and financial benefits to their businesses possible through programs that integrate physical health with mental health and well-being. This adds obvious layers and complexity to the ROI conversation.

Preparing for any ROI measurement requires assessing all the data sources at your disposal. It’s critical to obtain as close to a 360-degree view of the entire employee population as possible, which typically requires melding multiple disparate data sources. Medical and pharmacy claims, lab values, biometric and clinical data from electronic health records (EHRs) are some examples. Data warehousing and analytics solutions can help this process by aggregating, integrating, enriching and normalizing data along with consultative services to provide the right insights.

Finally, a realistic timeframe for measuring program outcomes is a must, especially when claims are part of equation, to allow for the time lag between services rendered and paid out. Hence 12 to 18 months serves as an optimal window to gauge discernible changes to patterns of care experience and member behavior. That said, periodic measurements throughout this time are essential for tweaking and adjusting workflows and processes to ensure proper data aggregation (e.g. presence of required code sets, uniform cadence in receipt of various data types, etc.).

Data-driven ROI analysis

Be aware of employee engagement factors

Achieving maximum ROI from wellness programs comes from changing behaviors, especially of those who are most at risk for adverse health events and consequently would benefit the most from these initiatives. For example, employees with chronic conditions who struggle with medication adherence or with managing stress due to work and family obligations. Promoting and maintaining engagement in such groups is challenging, but key to the success of the program itself.

On the same token, initial engagement tends to be high among members who are healthier and would likely gain little from a wellness or similar program, especially when there are participation incentives involved. Engagement typically tends to decline once the incentive requirements are met or phased out.

Setting up cohorts of participants with these factors in mind is critical because the metrics chosen to measure success levels in each will vary. Leveraging the expertise of data analytics vendors and consultants to define and set up such study cohorts—with and without comparable controls—goes a long way in these endeavors.

For example, employees who are engaged in wellness programs tend to also take advantage of preventive services and have a primary care provider. Consequently, data typically will show that they have higher rates of primary care and in-network utilization—whereas those who don’t participate have more ED and out-of-network services.

Establish key metrics

t is vital to ask the question, “Are we measuring the right things for each cohort for this particular initiative?” Defining the right metrics for a cohort is therefore an important aspect of the study design. Example: Establishing new primary care provider relationships and closing care gaps would be good metrics for employees who have traditionally not sought regular primary care in the past. On the other hand, keeping pertinent lab or biometric values within normal ranges, or garnering low scores on health risk assessment tools may be better suited for healthier and more engaged populations. Establishing clear baselines for each metric on day 0 is imperative for apples-to-apples comparisons.

Many employers are using non-traditional data sources to track metrics like sick time, other leave utilization, and rates of disability claims to evaluate the effectiveness of a wellness program. Data analytics and warehousing vendors offer tremendous advantages in this area by integrating disparate data sources.

Consider a pilot program

Pilot programs for a carefully chosen group with comparative control groups is always recommended, especially for new wellness initiatives. In addition to ironing out administrative and process challenges, they provide a great means of gauging the operational effort and resources required. This is an often-overlooked expense not featured in ROI calculations.

Results from a pilot program can go a long way toward determining an effective roll-out strategy. It’s essential to compare these results against the total employee population for the same timeframe. Example: An increase in the rates of flu vaccine compliance among employees in a pilot group does not mean much if vaccine compliance also increased in the total employee population due to onsite flu clinics. With successful pilots that show a definite improvement in outcomes for the participants, odds of further success are better when the program is expanded to demographically similar employees.

Let measurable results drive strategic investments

The last few months have brought renewed focus on the overall well-being of the workforce. Employers recognize the importance of the physical, mental and emotional wellness of their employees and their families. It’s not surprising that wellness program vendors, especially those that provide integrated services, are popular.

But rather than jumping on the wellness bandwagon or adding a program just to expand the suite of benefits, employers would be better served to make data-driven decisions. They would do well to engage the many data analytics vendors who provide evaluation services to answer key questions. “Is this right for our company?” and “Will this save me money on health care costs?” are the types of questions that can be answered even before the program is implemented, based on existing statistics or sample data sets.

Rani Aravamudhan

Rani Aravamudhan is senior clinical consultant at HDMS. She is a physician (specialty – General Medicine) with extensive experience in the EMR/EHR and population health industries with a focus on clinical transformation, workflow design and development, value-based care, risk management and clinical quality and performance reporting. Her strong background in clinical medicine and experience in the HIT industry make her successful in navigating payer, provider and technology vendor landscapes.

Article

Keep Essential Workers Safe: Data Analytics Strategies to Guide Effective Benefits Design

Published in HR Executive
Authored by Rani Aravamudhan, Senior Clinical Consultant, HDMS


HR executives have followed the time-tested adage of past behavior being the best predictor of future behavior – evaluating utilization patterns over time to make educated projections for the upcoming year. However, given the skewed healthcare consumption caused by COVID-19, these traditional means of assessing year over year trends fall predictably short.

Read the five strategies suggested to guide effective benefit design.

Download PDF reprint